↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and clinical challenges among adults with primary immunodeficiency and recombination-activating gene deficiency

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and clinical challenges among adults with primary immunodeficiency and recombination-activating gene deficiency
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dylan Lawless, Christoph B. Geier, Jocelyn R. Farmer, Hana Lango Allen, Daniel Thwaites, Faranaz Atschekzei, Matthew Brown, David Buchbinder, Siobhan O. Burns, Manish J. Butte, Krisztian Csomos, Sri V.V. Deevi, William Egner, Stephan Ehl, Martha M. Eibl, Olajumoke Fadugba, Zsofia Foldvari, Deanna M. Green, Sarah E. Henrickson, Steven M. Holland, Tami John, Christian Klemann, Taco W. Kuijpers, Fernando Moreira, Alexander Piller, Paula Rayner-Matthews, Neil D. Romberg, Ravishankar Sargur, Reinhold E. Schmidt, Claudia Schröder, Catharina Schuetz, Svetlana O. Sharapova, Ken G.C. Smith, Georgios Sogkas, Carsten Speckmann, Kathleen Stirrups, Adrian J. Thrasher, Hermann M. Wolf, Luigi D. Notarangelo, Rashida Anwar, Joan Boyes, Boglarka Ujhazi, NIHR BioResource–Rare Diseases Consortium, James Thaventhiran, Jolan E. Walter, Sinisa Savic

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Other 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 13 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,208,166
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#5,606
of 11,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,140
of 346,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#113
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.