↓ Skip to main content

A Late Cretaceous epeiric carbonate platform: the Haftoman Formation of Central Iran

Overview of attention for article published in Facies, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
A Late Cretaceous epeiric carbonate platform: the Haftoman Formation of Central Iran
Published in
Facies, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10347-018-0523-6
Authors

Markus Wilmsen, Michaela Berensmeier, Franz Theodor Fürsich, Mahmoud Reza Majidifard, Felix Schlagintweit

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 35%
Researcher 3 18%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 59%
Chemistry 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,466,701
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Facies
#135
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#383,689
of 446,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Facies
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.