↓ Skip to main content

Peer Commentaries on Green (2002) and Schmidt (2002)

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Peer Commentaries on Green (2002) and Schmidt (2002)
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, December 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1020603214218
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 33%
Researcher 7 17%
Other 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 33%
Social Sciences 9 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,678,422
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,398
of 3,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,662
of 137,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.