↓ Skip to main content

Grade Failure and Special Education Placement in Sexual Offenders’ Educational Histories

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Grade Failure and Special Education Placement in Sexual Offenders’ Educational Histories
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10508-006-9018-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

James M. Cantor, Michael E. Kuban, Thomas Blak, Philip E. Klassen, Robert Dickey, Ray Blanchard

Abstract

A sample of 701 adult men underwent assessment following illegal or clinically significant sexual behaviors or interests. Patients were categorized on the basis of phallometric (penile) responses in the laboratory to erotic stimuli depicting adults, pubescent children, and prepubescent children; histories of sexual offenses; and self-reported sexual interests. Comprising the categories were men sexually interested in prepubescent children (pedophiles; n = 114), men sexually interested in pubescent children (hebephiles; n = 377), men sexually interested in adults and who had committed a sexual offense against an adult (teleiophilic offenders; n = 139), and men sexually interested in adults and who had no known history of any sexual offenses (teleiophilic nonoffenders; n = 71). Patients' assessments included IQ testing and self-reported academic history, which included any grade failures and assignment to special education classes. Relative to the teleiophilic offenders, both the pedophilic and the hebephilic groups showed approximately double the odds of failing a grade or being enrolled in special education, both before and after covarying IQ. No significant differences were detected between the teleiophilic offenders and the teleiophilic nonoffenders. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that an erotic age preference for children sometimes results from a perturbation of neurodevelopment occurring early in life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 63 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 21%
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 48%
Social Sciences 11 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,335,388
of 23,392,375 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1,850
of 3,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,315
of 66,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,392,375 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.