↓ Skip to main content

「芸術のDNA」を模写する復元技術:高精度「クローン文化財」制作

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「芸術のDNA」を模写する復元技術:高精度「クローン文化財」制作
Published in
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, March 2018
DOI 10.1241/johokanri.60.845
Authors

宮廻 正明

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,499,906
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#239
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,822
of 344,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.