↓ Skip to main content

過去からのメディア論 マージェス『知財の正義』を読む:知的財産権はなぜ必要か

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
過去からのメディア論 マージェス『知財の正義』を読む:知的財産権はなぜ必要か
Published in
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, March 2018
DOI 10.1241/johokanri.60.894
Authors

大谷 卓史

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#14,396,821
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#452
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,438
of 344,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#17
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.