↓ Skip to main content

The origins and genetic structure of three co-resident Chinese Muslim populations: the Salar, Bo'an and Dongxiang

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
The origins and genetic structure of three co-resident Chinese Muslim populations: the Salar, Bo'an and Dongxiang
Published in
Human Genetics, May 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00439-003-0948-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Wang, Cheryl Wise, Tom Baric, Michael L. Black, Alan H. Bittles

Abstract

A genome-based investigation of three Muslim populations, the Salar, Bo'an, and Dongxiang, was conducted on 212 individuals (148 males, 64 females) co-resident in Jishisan County, a minority autonomous region located in the province of Gansu, PR China. The Salar are believed to be of Turkic origin, whereas the Bo'an and Dongxiang both speak Mongolian. Biparental dinucleotide markers on chromosomes 13 and 15 indicated elevated mean homozygosity in the Salar (0.32), Bo'an (0.32), and Dongxiang (0.27), equivalent to inbreeding coefficients ( F(is) ) of 0.16; 0.12; 0.01, confirming varying levels of endogamous and consanguineous marriage in all three communities. Y-chromosome unique event polymorphisms (UEPs) showed that males in the three communities shared common ancient origins, with 80-90% of haplotypes in common. However, the high levels of community-specific Y-chromosome STR haplotypes strongly suggested the action(s) of founder effect, genetic drift and preferential consanguinity during more recent historical time. By comparison with the marked inter-community differentiation revealed by the Y-chromosome STRs (29.4%), the mtDNA data indicated similarity between the female lineages of each community with just 1.2% inter-community variation. The combined use of these different marker systems gives an in-depth historical perspective, and provides evidence of past inter-marriage between genetically diverse male founders of each community and Han Chinese females with subsequent community endogamy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 10%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 33%
Social Sciences 4 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Arts and Humanities 2 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#934
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,781
of 54,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.