↓ Skip to main content

Negative autoregulation of RANKL and c-Src signaling in osteoclasts

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Negative autoregulation of RANKL and c-Src signaling in osteoclasts
Published in
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00774-007-0751-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keiichiro Yogo, Norihiro Ishida-Kitagawa, Tatsuo Takeya

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 57%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 71%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,863,403
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
#137
of 787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,291
of 69,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.