| Title |
Increased thorn length in Acacia depranolobium —an induced response to browsing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, February 1987
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00378718 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. P. Young |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 26% |
| Unknown | 4 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 70% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,674
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,518
of 44,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.