↓ Skip to main content

Mining fuzzy association rules using a memetic algorithm based on structure representation

Overview of attention for article published in Memetic Computing, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Mining fuzzy association rules using a memetic algorithm based on structure representation
Published in
Memetic Computing, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12293-016-0220-3
Authors

Chuan-Kang Ting, Rung-Tzuo Liaw, Ting-Chen Wang, Tzung-Pei Hong

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 22%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Other 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 35%
Engineering 4 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,466,701
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Memetic Computing
#30
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#356,479
of 421,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memetic Computing
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one scored the same or higher as 7 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.