↓ Skip to main content

Morphology of female genital tracts in Dasypodidae (Xenarthra, Mammalia): a comparative survey

Overview of attention for article published in Zoomorphology, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Morphology of female genital tracts in Dasypodidae (Xenarthra, Mammalia): a comparative survey
Published in
Zoomorphology, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00435-005-0111-5
Authors

Pablo D. Cetica, Hernán J. Aldana Marcos, María Susana Merani

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 8%
Malaysia 1 3%
Unknown 34 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Master 5 13%
Professor 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 45%
Environmental Science 5 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Zoomorphology
#114
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,697
of 59,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoomorphology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.