↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive detection of pathogens in immunocompromised children with bloodstream infections by next-generation sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive detection of pathogens in immunocompromised children with bloodstream infections by next-generation sequencing
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-22133-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuhiro Horiba, Jun-ichi Kawada, Yusuke Okuno, Nobuyuki Tetsuka, Takako Suzuki, Shotaro Ando, Yasuko Kamiya, Yuka Torii, Tetsuya Yagi, Yoshiyuki Takahashi, Yoshinori Ito

Abstract

Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a severe complication in immunocompromised patients. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows us to analyze comprehensively and quantitatively all microorganisms present in a clinical sample. Thirty-five pediatric patients (12 with BSI and 23 with suspected BSI/negative blood culture) were enrolled. Plasma/serum samples were used for sequencing and the results were compared with those from blood culture. Sequencing reads of bacteria isolated in blood culture were identified by NGS in all plasma/serum samples at disease onset. Bacteria isolated in blood culture were identical to the dominant bacteria by NGS in 8 of 12 patients. Bacterial reads per million reads of the sequence depth (BR) > 200 and relative importance values of the dominant bacteria (P1) > 0.5 were employed to determine causative pathogens. Causative pathogens were detected using these criteria in 7 of 12 patients with BSI. Additionally, causative bacteria were detected in the plasma/serum at 7 days before disease onset in two patients with catheter-related BSI. Causative pathogens, including virus, were identified in three patients with suspected BSI. Lastly, a total of 62 resistance genes were detected by NGS. In conclusion, NGS is a new method to identify causative microorganisms in BSI and may predict BSI in some patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Other 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 9 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2021.
All research outputs
#13,066,779
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#56,786
of 124,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,927
of 330,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,881
of 3,986 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,986 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.