↓ Skip to main content

Clinically non-functioning pituitary adenoma

Overview of attention for article published in Pituitary, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Clinically non-functioning pituitary adenoma
Published in
Pituitary, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11102-006-0412-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig A. Jaffe

Abstract

Non-functioning pituitary tumors are relatively common. A large number of these tumors are incidentally found pituitary microadenomas (<1 cm) and are usually of no clinical importance. Those tumors that require treatment are generally macroadenomas and come to medical attention because of mass effect and/or hypopituitarism. Visual field defects are present in roughly 70% of patients with non-functioning macroadenoma at the time of diagnosis and the majority of these patients have at least growth deficiency and hypogonadism. By immunocytochemistry, the large majority of these tumors are glycoprotein producing and less commonly they are non-functioning somatotroph, lactotroph or corticotoph adenomas. In contrast to the immunocytochemistry results, only a minority of these tumors actively secrete intact gonadotrophs or glycoprotein subunits. Therapy is directed at eliminating mass effect and correcting hypopituitarism. There are anecdotal reports of tumor shrinkage during therapy with either dopamine agonists or somatostatin agonists; however tumor response to medical treatment is not reliable. For most patients, transphenoidal resection of the tumor is the preferable primary treatment. Surgery improves visual defects in the majority of patients and a lesser number will recover pituitary function. In the past, pituitary radiation was commonly administered following pituitary surgery; however the need for routine radiation has recently been reevaluated. Although tumor recurrence at 10 years post surgery may be as high as 50%, few patients with recurrence will have clinical symptoms. Close follow-up with surveillance pituitary scans should be performed after surgery and radiation therapy reserved for patients having significant tumor recurrence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 80 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 26 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 30 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Pituitary
#140
of 491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,212
of 69,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pituitary
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 491 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them