↓ Skip to main content

Neurological manifestations and neuroradiological presentation of Erdheim-Chester disease: report of 6 cases and systematic review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Neurological manifestations and neuroradiological presentation of Erdheim-Chester disease: report of 6 cases and systematic review of the literature
Published in
Journal of Neurology, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00415-006-0160-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florence Lachenal, François Cotton, Hélène Desmurs-Clavel, Julien Haroche, Hervé Taillia, Nadine Magy, Mohamed Hamidou, Juan Salvatierra, Jean-Charles Piette, Denis Vital-Durand, Hugues Rousset

Abstract

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare, non-Langerhans form of histiocytosis of unknown etiology that affects multiple organs. We report 6 cases of ECD with neurological involvement and neuroradiological abnormalities on brain MRI. A literature review revealed 60 other cases of ECD with neurological involvement. We therefore analyzed 66 ECD patients with neurological involvement. Cerebellar and pyramidal syndromes were the most frequent clinical manifestations (41% and 45% of cases), but seizures, headaches, neuropsychiatric or cognitive troubles, sensory disturbances, cranial nerve paralysis or asymptomatic lesions were also reported. Neurological manifestations were always associated with other organ involvement, especially of bones (at least 86%) and diabetes insipidus (47%). Neurological involvement was responsible for severe functional handicaps in almost all patients and was responsible for the death of 6 of the 66 patients (9%). Neuroradiological findings could be separated into three patterns: the infiltrative pattern (44%), with widespread lesions, nodules or intracerebral masses, the meningeal pattern (37%), with either thickening of the dura mater or meningioma-like tumors, and the composite pattern (19%), with both infiltrative and meningeal lesions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Ethiopia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 57%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,949,785
of 24,153,435 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#292
of 4,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,582
of 70,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,153,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.