↓ Skip to main content

Fundamentals and commercial aspects of nanobiosensors in point-of-care clinical diagnostics

Overview of attention for article published in 3 Biotech, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Fundamentals and commercial aspects of nanobiosensors in point-of-care clinical diagnostics
Published in
3 Biotech, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13205-018-1148-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kuldeep Mahato, Pawan Kumar Maurya, Pranjal Chandra

Abstract

Among various problems faced by mankind, health-related concerns are prevailing since long which are commonly found in the form of infectious diseases and different metabolic disorders. The clinical cure and management of such abnormalities are greatly dependent on the availability of their diagnoses. The conventional diagnostics used for such purposes are extremely powerful; however, most of these are limited by time-consuming protocols and require higher volume of test sample, etc. A new evolving technology called "biosensor" in this context shows an enormous potential for an alternative diagnostic device, which constantly compliments the conventional diagnoses. In this review, we have summarized different kinds of biosensors and their fundamental understanding with various state-of-the-art examples. A critical examination of different types of biosensing mechanisms is also reported highlighting the advantages of electrochemical biosensors for its great potentials in next-generation commercially viable modules. In recent years, a number of nanomaterials are extensively used to enhance not only the performance of biosensing mechanism, but also obtain robust, cheap, and fabrication-friendly durable mechanism. Herein, we have summarized the importance of nanomaterials in biosensing mechanism, their syntheses as well as characterization techniques. Subsequently, we have discussed the probe fabrication processes along with various techniques for assessing its analytical performances and potentials for commercial viability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 140 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Student > Master 15 11%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 55 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 11%
Materials Science 12 9%
Chemistry 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 66 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,789,096
of 23,393,513 outputs
Outputs from 3 Biotech
#833
of 1,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,305
of 331,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from 3 Biotech
#48
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,513 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.