| Title |
Raising Roofs, Crashing Cycles, and Playing Pool: Applications of a Data Structure for Finding Pairwise Interactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Discrete & Computational Geometry, December 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/pl00009479 |
| Authors |
D. Eppstein, J. Erickson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 24 | 43% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#133
of 609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,412
of 107,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 609 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.