| Title |
Comparisons between the diets of four abundant species of elasmobranchs in a subtropical embayment: implications for resource partitioning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, October 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-003-1218-1 |
| Authors |
W. T. White, M. E. Platell, I. C. Potter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 183 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 129 | 65% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,415,350
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#453
of 3,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,189
of 56,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.