↓ Skip to main content

Effects of predation-risk on habitat use by Himalayan Snowcocks

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Effects of predation-risk on habitat use by Himalayan Snowcocks
Published in
Oecologia, February 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf00323534
Pubmed ID
Authors

James D. Bland, Stanley A. Temple

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 20%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 67%
Environmental Science 3 20%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,674
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,502
of 57,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.