| Title |
Collection and Use of Wild Edible Fungi in Nepal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12231-007-9000-9 |
| Authors |
Morten Christensen, Sanjeeb Bhattarai, Shiva Devkota, Helle O. Larsen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 21% |
| Researcher | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,459,587
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#71
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,633
of 79,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.