↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Several Heavy Metals in Wild Edible Mushrooms from Regions of China

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of Several Heavy Metals in Wild Edible Mushrooms from Regions of China
Published in
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00128-009-9767-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin-Hua Chen, Hong-Bo Zhou, Guan-Zhou Qiu

Abstract

The metal (Cu, Ni, Cd, Hg, As, Pb) contents in wild edible mushrooms collected from three different sites in China were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry and atomic fluorescence spectrometry. All element concentrations were determined on a dry weight basis. A total of 11 species was studied, five being from the urban area and six from rural areas in China. The As content ranged from 0.44 to 1.48 mg/kg. The highest As content was seen in Macrolepiota crustosa from the urban area, and the lowest in Russula virescens from rural areas. A high Ni concentration (1.35 mg/kg) was found in Calvatia craniiformis from the urban area. The lowest Ni level was 0.11 mg/kg, for the species R. virescens and Cantharellus cibarius. The Cu content ranged from 39.0 to 181.5 mg/kg. The highest Cu content was seen in Agaricus silvaticus and the lowest in C. cibarius. The Pb content ranged from 1.9 to 10.8 mg/kg. The highest Pb value was found in C. craniiformis. The Cd content ranged from 0.4 to 91.8 mg/kg. The highest Cd value was found in M. crustosa. The Hg content ranged from 0.28 to 3.92 mg/kg. The highest Hg level was found in Agaricus species. The levels of the heavy metals Cd, Pb, and Hg in the studied mushroom species from urban area can be considered high. The metal-to-metal correlation analysis supported they were the same source of contamination. High automobile traffic was identified as the most likely source of the contamination. Based upon the present safety standards, consumption of those mushrooms that grow in the polluted urban area should be avoided.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 2%
Fiji 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 26%
Chemistry 7 15%
Environmental Science 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,022,830
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#816
of 4,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,417
of 100,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.