↓ Skip to main content

Landmark-based evaluation of a deformable motion correction for DCE-MRI of the liver

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Landmark-based evaluation of a deformable motion correction for DCE-MRI of the liver
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11548-018-1710-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Strehlow, Nadine Spahr, Jan Rühaak, Hendrik Laue, Nasreddin Abolmaali, Tobias Preusser, Andrea Schenk

Abstract

Annotation of meaningful landmark ground truth on DCE-MRI is difficult and laborious. Motion correction methods applied to DCE-MRI of the liver are thus mostly evaluated using qualitative or indirect measures. We propose a novel landmark annotation scheme that facilitates the generation of landmark ground truth on larger clinical datasets. In our annotation scheme, landmarks are equally distributed over all time points of all available dataset cases and annotated by multiple observers on a per-pair basis. The scheme is used to annotate 26 DCE-MRI of the liver. A subset of the ground truth is used to optimize parameters of a deformable motion correction. Several variants of the motion correction are evaluated on the remaining cases with respect to distances of corresponding landmarks after registration, deformation field properties, and qualitative measures. A landmark ground truth on 26 cases could be generated in under 12 h per observer with a mean inter-observer distance below the mean voxel diagonal. Furthermore, the landmarks are spatially well distributed within the liver. Parameter optimization significantly improves the performance of the motion correction, and landmark distance after registration is 2 mm. Qualitative evaluation of the motion correction reflects the quantitative results. The annotation scheme makes a landmark-based evaluation of motion corrections for hepatic DCE-MRI practically feasible for larger clinical datasets. The comparably large number of cases enables both optimization and evaluation of motion correction methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 37%
Student > Master 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 26%
Engineering 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Linguistics 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,932,103
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#195
of 858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,146
of 330,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 858 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.