↓ Skip to main content

Information Routeing Groups – Towards the Global Superbrain: or how to find out what you need to know rather than what you think you need to know

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Technology, February 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Information Routeing Groups – Towards the Global Superbrain: or how to find out what you need to know rather than what you think you need to know
Published in
Journal of Information Technology, February 1986
DOI 10.1057/jit.1986.5
Authors

David Andrews

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 60%
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 40%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 40%
Arts and Humanities 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,531,132
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Technology
#62
of 187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,020
of 41,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them