↓ Skip to main content

Public Key Cryptography — PKC 2003 : 6th International Workshop on Practice and Theory in Public Key Cryptography Miami, FL, USA, January 6–8, 2003 Proceedings

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Public Key Cryptography — PKC 2003 : 6th International Workshop on Practice and Theory in Public Key Cryptography Miami, FL, USA, January 6–8, 2003 Proceedings'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Efficient Construction of (Distributed) Verifiable Random Functions
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 An Identity-Based Signature from Gap Diffie-Hellman Groups
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Threshold Signatures, Multisignatures and Blind Signatures Based on the Gap-Diffie-Hellman-Group Signature Scheme
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 An Efficient Two-Party Public Key Cryptosystem Secure against Adaptive Chosen Ciphertext Attack
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 On the Bit Security of NTRUEncrypt
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Equivalence between Semantic Security and Indistinguishability against Chosen Ciphertext Attacks
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Randomness Re-use in Multi-recipient Encryption Schemeas
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Public Key Trace and Revoke Scheme Secure against Adaptive Chosen Ciphertext Attack
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 The Cramer-Shoup Strong-RSA Signature Scheme Revisited
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Strong Key-Insulated Signature Schemes
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 A Verifiable Secret Shuffe of Homomorphic Encryptions
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Round-Optimal Contributory Conference Key Agreement
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Security Analysis of the MOR Cryptosystem
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 A Practical Attack on Some Braid Group Based Cryptographic Primitives
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 A Refined Power-Analysis Attack on Elliptic Curve Cryptosystems
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Validation of Elliptic Curve Public Keys
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Exceptional Procedure Attack on Elliptic Curve Cryptosystems
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 On Montgomery-Like Representations for Elliptic Curves over GF (2 k )
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 A Dedicated Sieving Hardware
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 A Fast and Secure Implementation of Sflash
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 A Practical Public Key Cryptosystem from Paillier and Rabin Schemes
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 A Lattice Based Public Key Cryptosystem Using Polynomial Representations
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 The Security of DSA and ECDSA
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Side-Channel Attacks on Textbook RSA and ElGamal Encryption
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 On the Security of HFE, HFEv- and Quartz
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Generic Attacks and the Security of Quartz
Attention for Chapter 3: Threshold Signatures, Multisignatures and Blind Signatures Based on the Gap-Diffie-Hellman-Group Signature Scheme
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Threshold Signatures, Multisignatures and Blind Signatures Based on the Gap-Diffie-Hellman-Group Signature Scheme
Chapter number 3
Book title
Public Key Cryptography — PKC 2003
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2003
DOI 10.1007/3-540-36288-6_3
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-000324-3, 978-3-54-036288-3
Authors

Alexandra Boldyreva, Boldyreva, Alexandra

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Unknown 160 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 28%
Student > Master 38 22%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 4%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 26 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 114 67%
Mathematics 12 7%
Physics and Astronomy 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 33 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,699,355
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,575
of 8,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,408
of 128,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#26
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.