↓ Skip to main content

A review of wildlife changes in southern bottomland hardwoods due to forest management practices

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands, March 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
A review of wildlife changes in southern bottomland hardwoods due to forest management practices
Published in
Wetlands, March 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf03160620
Authors

T. Bently Wigley, Thoams H. Roberts

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Student > Bachelor 3 33%
Researcher 2 22%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 67%
Computer Science 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#222
of 1,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,500
of 22,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,242 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them