↓ Skip to main content

Medical training in the UK: sleepwalking to disaster

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medical training in the UK: sleepwalking to disaster
Published in
The Lancet, May 2007
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60754-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morris Brown, Nick Boon, Nick Brooks, John Camm, Paul Corris, Mark Caulfield, Edwin Chilvers, Pamela Ewan, John Gibson, George Griffin, Ashley Grossman, Alistair Hall, George Hart, Tony Heagerty, Humphrey Hodgson, Philip Home, Richard Hughes, Kay-Tee Khaw, John Lazarus, David Leaper, John Monson, Stephen O'Rahilly, Brian Rowlands, Neil Scolding, Robert Sutton, Roy Taylor, Hugh Watkins, Nick Wright

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 27%
Other 2 18%
Librarian 1 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 82%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2008.
All research outputs
#8,572,390
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#26,041
of 42,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,601
of 86,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#98
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.