↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis of breast cancer based on microcalcifications using grating-based phase contrast CT

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis of breast cancer based on microcalcifications using grating-based phase contrast CT
Published in
European Radiology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00330-017-5158-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinbin Li, Hewei Gao, Zhiqiang Chen, Li Zhang, Xiaohua Zhu, Shengping Wang, Weijun Peng

Abstract

Microcalcifications are an important feature in the diagnosis of breast cancer, especially in the early stages. In this paper, a CT-based method is proposed to potentially distinguish benign and malignant breast diseases based on the distributions of microcalcifications using grating-based phase-contrast imaging on a conventional X-ray tube. The method presented based on the ratio of dark-field signals to attenuation signals in CT images is compared with the existing method based on the ratio in projections, and the threshold for the classification of microcalcifications in the two types of breast diseases is obtained using our approach. The experiment was operated on paraffin-fixed specimens that originated from 20 female patients ranging from 27-65 years old. Compared with the method based on projection images (AUC = 0.87), the proposed method is more effective (AUC = 0.95) to distinguish the two types of diseases. The discrimination threshold of microcalcifications for the classification of diseases in CT images is found to be 3.78 based on the Youden index. The proposed method can be further developed to improve the early diagnosis and diagnostic accuracy and reduce the clinical misdiagnosis rate of breast cancer. • Microcalcifications are of special importance to indicate early breast cancer. • Grating-based phase-contrast imaging can improve the diagnosis of breast cancers. • The method described here can better classify benign and malignant breast diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Librarian 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 9 22%
Engineering 7 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,466,701
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#3,351
of 4,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#377,762
of 440,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#60
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.