↓ Skip to main content

Authors’ Reply to Buckner et al.: ‘Comment on: “The General Adaptation Syndrome: A Foundation for the Concept of Periodization”

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Authors’ Reply to Buckner et al.: ‘Comment on: “The General Adaptation Syndrome: A Foundation for the Concept of Periodization”
Published in
Sports Medicine, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40279-018-0884-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron J. Cunanan, Brad H. DeWeese, John P. Wagle, Kevin M. Carroll, Robert Sausaman, W. Guy Hornsby, G. Gregory Haff, N. Travis Triplett, Kyle C. Pierce, Michael H. Stone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 18 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 29 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,184,852
of 25,591,967 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,469
of 2,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,459
of 345,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#41
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,591,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.