↓ Skip to main content

CellML: its future, present and past

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
390 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
11 CiteULike
connotea
4 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CellML: its future, present and past
Published in
Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology, June 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.01.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine M. Lloyd, Matt D.B. Halstead, Poul F. Nielsen

Abstract

Advances in biotechnology and experimental techniques have lead to the elucidation of vast amounts of biological data. Mathematical models provide a method of analysing this data; however, there are two issues that need to be addressed: (1) the need for standards for defining cell models so they can, for example, be exchanged across the World Wide Web, and also read into simulation software in a consistent format and (2) eliminating the errors which arise with the current method of model publication. CellML has evolved to meet these needs of the modelling community. CellML is a free, open-source, eXtensible markup language based standard for defining mathematical models of cellular function. In this paper we summarise the structure of CellML, its current applications (including biological pathway and electrophysiological models), and its future development--in particular, the development of toolsets and the integration of ontologies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
United Kingdom 6 3%
France 3 2%
Italy 3 2%
New Zealand 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 157 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 27%
Student > Master 14 7%
Professor 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 14 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 33%
Computer Science 41 22%
Engineering 24 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 5%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 22 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology
#334
of 925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,859
of 62,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.