↓ Skip to main content

Experiments with incremental concept formation: UNIMEM

Overview of attention for article published in Machine Learning, September 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
231 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Experiments with incremental concept formation: UNIMEM
Published in
Machine Learning, September 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00114264
Authors

Michael Lebowitz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
India 1 3%
Czechia 1 3%
Slovakia 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 30 83%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2008.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Machine Learning
#281
of 961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,406
of 11,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Machine Learning
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 961 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.