↓ Skip to main content

Ochratoxin A induces apoptosis in neuronal cells

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Nutrition, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Ochratoxin A induces apoptosis in neuronal cells
Published in
Genes & Nutrition, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12263-008-0109-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiangnan Zhang, Christine Boesch-Saadatmandi, Yijia Lou, Siegfried Wolffram, Patricia Huebbe, Gerald Rimbach

Abstract

The mycotoxin ochratoxin A (OTA), which is produced by Aspergillus and Penicillium subspecies, is a frequently present contaminant of food and feedstuffs. OTA exhibits a wide range of toxic activities including nephro- and hepatotoxicity. However, little is known regarding potential neurotoxic effects of OTA. In the present study primary neurons as well as SH-SY5Y neuronal cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of OTA (0.1-2.5 mumol/L). OTA treatment resulted in a dose-dependent increase in cytotoxicity in both neuronal cell types. Caspase-9 and caspase-3 were activated in response to OTA treatment. Furthermore, caspase inhibitors were effective in partly counteracting OTA induced neurocytotoxicity. OTA induced apoptosis was accompanied by a loss of mitochondria membrane potential. Overall, present data indicated that OTA is neurotoxic at relatively low concentrations. OTA induced neurotoxicity seems to be, at least party, mediated by apoptosis. OTA may contribute to the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease) in which apoptotic processes are centrally involved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
North Macedonia 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Chemistry 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,949,013
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#131
of 388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,710
of 170,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.