| Title |
Fluid therapy in neurointensive care patients: ESICM consensus and clinical practice recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-018-5086-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mauro Oddo, Daniele Poole, Raimund Helbok, Geert Meyfroidt, Nino Stocchetti, Pierre Bouzat, Maurizio Cecconi, Thomas Geeraerts, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Hervé Quintard, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Romergryko G. Geocadin, Claude Hemphill, Carole Ichai, David Menon, Jean-François Payen, Anders Perner, Martin Smith, José Suarez, Walter Videtta, Elisa R. Zanier, Giuseppe Citerio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 207 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 8% |
| United States | 16 | 8% |
| Spain | 12 | 6% |
| Argentina | 11 | 5% |
| Mexico | 9 | 4% |
| Italy | 8 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 2% |
| Colombia | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 18% |
| Unknown | 82 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 141 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 15% |
| Scientists | 24 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 316 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 59 | 19% |
| Researcher | 40 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 77 | 24% |
| Unknown | 66 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 174 | 55% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 82 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2021.
All research outputs
#299,929
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#252
of 5,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,826
of 347,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#6
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.