↓ Skip to main content

Topic...Comment

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, May 1989
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 294)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Topic...Comment
Published in
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, May 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf00138079
Authors

Geoffrey K. Pullum

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Professor 5 4%
Lecturer 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 88 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 18 14%
Psychology 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 91 69%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
#46
of 294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,055
of 14,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 294 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them