↓ Skip to main content

Tip-of-the-tongue states as metacognition

Overview of attention for article published in Metacognition and Learning, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Tip-of-the-tongue states as metacognition
Published in
Metacognition and Learning, August 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11409-006-9583-z
Authors

Bennett L. Schwartz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Canada 3 4%
India 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 59 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Professor 5 7%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 46%
Social Sciences 12 17%
Philosophy 6 9%
Linguistics 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 9 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Metacognition and Learning
#74
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,693
of 67,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metacognition and Learning
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them