↓ Skip to main content

Worst case scenario analysis for elliptic problems with uncertainty

Overview of attention for article published in Numerische Mathematik, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Worst case scenario analysis for elliptic problems with uncertainty
Published in
Numerische Mathematik, June 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00211-005-0601-x
Authors

I. Babuška, F. Nobile, R. Tempone

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 16%
Turkey 1 3%
Unknown 26 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 31%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 22%
Professor 5 16%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 10 31%
Engineering 8 25%
Computer Science 5 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2010.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Numerische Mathematik
#53
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,272
of 57,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Numerische Mathematik
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them