You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation of the 2017 Berlin Concussion in Sport Group Consensus Statement in contact and collision sports: a joint position statement from 11 national and international sports organisations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Sports Medicine, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099079 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jon S Patricios, Clare L Ardern, Michael David Hislop, Mark Aubry, Paul Bloomfield, Carolyn Broderick, Patrick Clifton, Ruben J Echemendia, Richard G Ellenbogen, Éanna Cian Falvey, Gordon Ward Fuller, Julie Grand, Dallas Hack, Peter Rex Harcourt, David Hughes, Nathan McGuirk, Willem Meeuwisse, Jeffrey Miller, John T Parsons, Simona Richiger, Allen Sills, Kevin B Moran, Jenny Shute, Martin Raftery |
| Abstract |
The 2017 Berlin Concussion in Sport Group Consensus Statement provides a global summary of best practice in concussion prevention, diagnosis and management, underpinned by systematic reviews and expert consensus. Due to their different settings and rules, individual sports need to adapt concussion guidelines according to their specific regulatory environment. At the same time, consistent application of the Berlin Consensus Statement's themes across sporting codes is likely to facilitate superior and uniform diagnosis and management, improve concussion education and highlight collaborative research opportunities. This document summarises the approaches discussed by medical representatives from the governing bodies of 10 different contact and collision sports in Dublin, Ireland in July 2017. Those sports are: American football, Australian football, basketball, cricket, equestrian sports, football/soccer, ice hockey, rugby league, rugby union and skiing. This document had been endorsed by 11 sport governing bodies/national federations at the time of being published. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 188 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 38 | 20% |
| United States | 37 | 20% |
| Canada | 22 | 12% |
| Australia | 10 | 5% |
| Ireland | 8 | 4% |
| South Africa | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 51 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 120 | 64% |
| Scientists | 34 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 297 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 13% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 8% |
| Researcher | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 17% |
| Unknown | 89 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 40 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 94 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2020.
All research outputs
#301,709
of 25,352,304 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#656
of 6,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,894
of 338,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#23
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,352,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.