↓ Skip to main content

Understanding Adult Participant and Parent Empowerment Prior to Evaluation in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Understanding Adult Participant and Parent Empowerment Prior to Evaluation in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10897-018-0228-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina G. S. Palmer, Allyn McConkie‐Rosell, Ingrid A. Holm, Kimberly LeBlanc, Janet S. Sinsheimer, Lauren C. Briere, Naghmeh Dorrani, Matthew R. Herzog, Sharyn Lincoln, Kelly Schoch, Rebecca C. Spillmann, Elly Brokamp, Undiagnosed Diseases Network

Abstract

The burden of living with an undiagnosed condition is high and includes physical and emotional suffering, frustrations, and uncertainty. For patients and families experiencing these stressors, higher levels of empowerment may be associated with better outcomes. Thus, it is important to understand the experiences of patients with undiagnosed conditions and their families affected by undiagnosed conditions in order to identify strategies for fostering empowerment. In this study, we used the Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) to assess levels of empowerment and support group participation in 35 adult participants and 67 parents of child participants in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) prior to their UDN in-person evaluation. Our results revealed significantly lower empowerment scores on the GCOS-24 in adult participants compared to parents of child participants [t(100) = - 3.01, p = 0.003, average difference = - 11.12, 95% CI (- 3.78, - 18.46)] and no significant association between support group participation and empowerment scores. The majority of participants (84.3%, 86/102) are not currently participating in any support groups, and participation rates were not significantly different for adult participants and parents of child participants (11.4 vs. 19.7%, respectively, FE p = 0.40). Open-ended responses provided additional insight into support group participation, the challenges of living with undiagnosed conditions, and positive coping strategies. Future research will evaluate the extent to which empowerment scores change as participation in the UDN unfolds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Psychology 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 17 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,409,228
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#406
of 1,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,717
of 331,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#19
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.