| Title |
Brittle fracture propagation in rock under compression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Fracture, September 1965
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00186851 |
| Authors |
E. Hoek, Z. T. Bieniawski |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 44 | 40% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 29 | 26% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Energy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Fracture
#32
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#373
of 1,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Fracture
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them