| Title |
An evaluation of the utility of additional tests in the preoperative diagnostics of acute appendicitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00423-009-0565-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryszard Anielski, Beata Kuśnierz-Cabala, Krystyna Szafraniec |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 26% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 50% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,547,176
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#268
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,765
of 166,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them