↓ Skip to main content

Agency issues with small lobby firms: a test of competing hypotheses

Overview of attention for article published in Interest Groups & Advocacy, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Agency issues with small lobby firms: a test of competing hypotheses
Published in
Interest Groups & Advocacy, February 2018
DOI 10.1057/s41309-018-0029-1
Authors

Anne Whitesell, Eleanor Schiff, David Lowery

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 50%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,589,103
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Interest Groups & Advocacy
#148
of 164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,664
of 330,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Interest Groups & Advocacy
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.