↓ Skip to main content

The Nested Context Language reuse features

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Brazilian Computer Society, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
The Nested Context Language reuse features
Published in
Journal of Brazilian Computer Society, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s13173-010-0017-z
Authors

Carlos de Salles Soares Neto, Luiz Fernando Gomes Soares, Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 12%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Postgraduate 3 18%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 14 82%
Design 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Brazilian Computer Society
#14
of 65 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,207
of 104,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Brazilian Computer Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them