↓ Skip to main content

Height alone, rather than body surface area, suffices for risk estimation in ascending aortic aneurysm

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
51 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Height alone, rather than body surface area, suffices for risk estimation in ascending aortic aneurysm
Published in
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.140
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad A. Zafar, Yupeng Li, John A. Rizzo, Paris Charilaou, Ayman Saeyeldin, Camilo A. Velasquez, Ahmed M. Mansour, Syed Usman Bin Mahmood, Wei-Guo Ma, Adam J. Brownstein, Maryann Tranquilli, Julia Dumfarth, Panagiotis Theodoropoulos, Kabir Thombre, Maryam Tanweer, Young Erben, Sven Peterss, Bulat A. Ziganshin, John A. Elefteriades

Abstract

In international guidelines, risk estimation for thoracic ascending aortic aneurysm (TAAA) is based on aortic diameter. We previously introduced the aortic size index (ASI), defined as aortic size/body surface area (BSA), as a predictor of aortic dissection, rupture, and death. However, weight might not contribute substantially to aortic size and growth. We seek to evaluate the height-based aortic height index (AHI) versus ASI for risk estimation and revisit our natural history calculations. Aortic diameters and long-term complications of 780 patients with TAAA were analyzed. Growth rate estimates, yearly complication rates, and survival were assessed. Risk stratification was performed using regression models. The predictive value of AHI and ASI was compared. Patients were stratified into 4 categories of yearly risk of complications based on their ASI and AHI. ASIs (cm/m2) of ≤2.05, 2.08 to 2.95, 3.00 to 3.95 and ≥4, and AHIs (cm/m) of ≤2.43, 2.44 to 3.17, 3.21 to 4.06, and ≥4.1 were associated with a 4%, 7%, 12%, and 18% average yearly risk of complications, respectively. Five-year complication-free survival was progressively worse with increasing ASI and AHI. Both ASI and AHI were shown to be significant predictors of complications (P < .05). AHI categories 3.05 to 3.69, 3.70 to 4.34, and ≥4.35 cm/m were associated with a significantly increased risk of complications (P < .05). The overall fit of the model using AHI was modestly superior according to the concordance statistic. Compared with indices including weight, the simpler height-based ratio (excluding weight and BSA calculations) yields satisfactory results for evaluating the risk of natural complications in patients with TAAA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 44 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 48%
Engineering 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 50 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,377,086
of 25,635,728 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#138
of 7,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,500
of 447,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#1
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,635,728 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,031 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.