↓ Skip to main content

Taxonomy of the genusGlycine, domestication and uses of soybeans

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Botany, July 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Taxonomy of the genusGlycine, domestication and uses of soybeans
Published in
Economic Botany, July 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf02859119
Authors

T. Hymowitz, C. A. Newell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 106 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 19%
Student > Master 15 14%
Researcher 7 6%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 26 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Engineering 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 31 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,547,176
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#277
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,868
of 7,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.