↓ Skip to main content

Herbicidal inhibitors of amino acid biosynthesis and herbicide-tolerant crops

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
16 patents
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Herbicidal inhibitors of amino acid biosynthesis and herbicide-tolerant crops
Published in
Amino Acids, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00726-005-0254-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Tan, R. Evans, B. Singh

Abstract

Acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) inhibitors interfere with branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis by inhibiting AHAS. Glyphosate affects aromatic amino acid biosynthesis by inhibiting 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS). Glufosinate inhibits glutamine synthetase and blocks biosynthesis of glutamine. AHAS gene variants that confer tolerance to AHAS inhibitors have been discovered in plants through selection or mutagenesis. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops have been commercialized based on these AHAS gene variants. A modified maize EPSPS gene and CP4-EPSPS gene from Agrobacterium sp. have been used to transform plants for target-based tolerance to glyphosate. A gox gene isolated from Ochrobactrum anthropi has also been employed to encode glyphosate oxidoreductase to detoxify glyphosate in plants. Glyphosate-tolerant crops with EPSPS transgene alone or both EPSPS and gox transgenes have been commercialized. Similarly, bar and pat genes isolated from Streptomyces hygroscopicus and S. viridochromogenes, respectively, have been inserted into plants to encode phosphinothricin N-acetyltransferase to detoxify glufosinate. Glufosinate-tolerant crops have been commercialized using one of these two transgenes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 159 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 17%
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 16%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 28 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Chemistry 10 6%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 40 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,854,643
of 24,212,485 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#105
of 1,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,237
of 68,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,212,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.