↓ Skip to main content

Methanogens in humans: potentially beneficial or harmful for health

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
Title
Methanogens in humans: potentially beneficial or harmful for health
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-018-8871-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prem Prashant Chaudhary, Patricia Lynne Conway, Jørgen Schlundt

Abstract

Methanogens are anaerobic prokaryotes from the domain archaea that utilize hydrogen to reduce carbon dioxide, acetate, and a variety of methyl compounds into methane. Earlier believed to inhabit only the extreme environments, these organisms are now reported to be found in various environments including mesophilic habitats and the human body. The biological significance of methanogens for humans has been re-evaluated in the last few decades. Their contribution towards pathogenicity has received much less attention than their bacterial counterparts. In humans, methanogens have been studied in the gastrointestinal tract, mouth, and vagina, and considerable focus has shifted towards elucidating their possible role in the progression of disease conditions in humans. Methanoarchaea are also part of the human skin microbiome and proposed to play a role in ammonia turnover. Compared to hundreds of different bacterial species, the human body harbors only a handful of methanogen species represented by Methanobrevibacter smithii, Methanobrevibacter oralis, Methanosphaera stadtmanae, Methanomassiliicoccus luminyensis, Candidatus Methanomassiliicoccus intestinalis, and Candidatus Methanomethylophilus alvus. Their presence in the human gut suggests an indirect correlation with severe diseases of the colon. In this review, we examine the current knowledge about the methanoarchaea in the human body and possible beneficial or less favorable interactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 193 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 17%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 60 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 27 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 67 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,000,523
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#138
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,646
of 334,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#4
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.