You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pathological laughing and crying
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3109/00048679609065020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frances L. Dark, John J. McGrath, Maria A. Ron |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 24% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 25% |
| Psychology | 7 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,696,232
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
#686
of 2,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,518
of 351,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
#90
of 397 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 397 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.