↓ Skip to main content

Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome): a clinical review and recommendations for treatment in the era of enzyme replacement therapy

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
patent
30 patents
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
425 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome): a clinical review and recommendations for treatment in the era of enzyme replacement therapy
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00431-007-0635-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Edmond Wraith, Maurizio Scarpa, Michael Beck, Olaf A. Bodamer, Linda De Meirleir, Nathalie Guffon, Allan Meldgaard Lund, Gunilla Malm, Ans T. Van der Ploeg, Jiri Zeman

Abstract

Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II; Hunter syndrome) is a rare X-linked recessive disease caused by deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme iduronate-2-sulphatase, leading to progressive accumulation of glycosaminoglycans in nearly all cell types, tissues and organs. Clinical manifestations include severe airway obstruction, skeletal deformities, cardiomyopathy and, in most patients, neurological decline. Death usually occurs in the second decade of life, although some patients with less severe disease have survived into their fifth or sixth decade. Until recently, there has been no effective therapy for MPS II, and care has been palliative. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant human iduronate-2-sulphatase (idursulfase), however, has now been introduced. Weekly intravenous infusions of idursulfase have been shown to improve many of the signs and symptoms and overall wellbeing in patients with MPS II. This paper provides an overview of the clinical manifestations, diagnosis and symptomatic management of patients with MPS II and provides recommendations for the use of ERT. The issue of treating very young patients and those with CNS involvement is also discussed. ERT with idursulfase has the potential to benefit many patients with MPS II, especially if started early in the course of the disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 363 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 69 18%
Researcher 51 14%
Student > Master 42 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 10%
Other 29 8%
Other 75 20%
Unknown 71 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 133 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 11%
Neuroscience 11 3%
Psychology 8 2%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 82 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,462,064
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#135
of 3,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,829
of 157,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them