↓ Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of Community Health Workers’ Role in Occupational Safety and Health Research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
A Systematic Review of Community Health Workers’ Role in Occupational Safety and Health Research
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10903-018-0711-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer E. Swanberg, Helen M. Nichols, Jessica M. Clouser, Pietra Check, Lori Edwards, Ashley M. Bush, Yancy Padilla, Gail Betz

Abstract

We systematically reviewed the literature to describe how community health workers (CHWs) are involved in occupational health and safety research and to identify areas for future research and research practice strategies. We searched five electronic databases from July 2015 through July 2016. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) study took place in the United States, (2) published as a full peer-review manuscript in English, (3) conducted occupational health and safety research, and (4) CHWs were involved in the research. The majority of 17 included studies took place in the agriculture industry (76%). CHWs were often involved in study implementation/design and research participant contact. Rationale for CHW involvement in research was due to local connections/acceptance, existing knowledge/skills, communication ability, and access to participants. Barriers to CHW involvement in research included competing demands on CHWs, recruitment and training difficulties, problems about research rigor and issues with proper data collection. Involving CHWs in occupational health and safety research has potential for improving inclusion of diverse, vulnerable and geographically isolated populations. Further research is needed to assess the challenges and opportunities of involving CHWs in this research and to develop evidence-based training strategies to teach CHWs to be lay-health researchers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Librarian 6 10%
Lecturer 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 20 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 18%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 22 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,256,102
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#258
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,215
of 335,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.