↓ Skip to main content

Renal transplant in methylmalonic acidemia: could it be the best option?

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Renal transplant in methylmalonic acidemia: could it be the best option?
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00467-007-0460-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riccardo Lubrano, Marco Elli, Massimo Rossi, Elisabetta Travasso, Claudia Raggi, Paola Barsotti, Claudia Carducci, Pasquale Berloco

Abstract

Methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) is an inborn error of organic acid metabolism. Patients with severe disease develop many complications despite treatment; often, the disease progresses to severe damage of the central nervous system or to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). When medical treatment is ineffective, liver, kidney, or combined liver and kidney transplantation is advocated. At present, there are no definite guidelines as for the organ to be transplanted, and results are inconsistent. We report on a 27-year-old woman with MMA MUT0. The clinical symptoms developed at age 4 months. She progressed to ESRD and received a kidney transplant in November 1996 at age 17 years. One hundred and twenty months after transplant, renal function is normal; although urinary levels of methylmalonic acid are above normal limits, no episodes of metabolic decompensation have been observed after transplantation. Although liver is the major site of methylmalonyl-CoA mutase activity, this case and similar ones in the literature suggest that the smaller mutase activity present in the transplanted kidney may be sufficient to ensure partial correction of the metabolism of organic acids sufficient to prevent the onset of episodes of metabolic decompensation. It is worth investigating whether kidney transplant can be a safer and more satisfactory alternative to liver transplantation in cases of MMA unresponsive to medical treatment although urine MMA excretion remains significantly elevated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 33%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#1,857
of 4,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,444
of 91,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.