↓ Skip to main content

Strategic manipulability without resoluteness or shared beliefs: Gibbard-Satterthwaite generalized

Overview of attention for article published in Social Choice and Welfare, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Strategic manipulability without resoluteness or shared beliefs: Gibbard-Satterthwaite generalized
Published in
Social Choice and Welfare, January 2000
DOI 10.1007/pl00007177
Authors

John Duggan, Thomas Schwartz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Hungary 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 33 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 29%
Researcher 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 13 34%
Social Sciences 5 13%
Mathematics 4 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Social Choice and Welfare
#187
of 468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,912
of 109,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Choice and Welfare
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 468 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.