↓ Skip to main content

Current treatments for sleep disturbances in individuals with dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Current treatments for sleep disturbances in individuals with dementia
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11920-009-0004-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cynthia L. Deschenes, Susan M. McCurry

Abstract

Sleep disturbances are widespread among older adults. Degenerative neurologic disorders that cause dementia, such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease, exacerbate age-related changes in sleep, as do many common comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions. Medications used to treat chronic illness and insomnia have many side effects that can further disrupt sleep and place patients at risk for injury. This article reviews the neurophysiology of sleep in normal aging and sleep changes associated with common dementia subtypes and comorbid conditions. Current pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic evidence-based treatment options are discussed, including the use of light therapy, increased physical and social activity, and multicomponent cognitive-behavioral interventions for improving sleep in institutionalized and community-dwelling adults with dementia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 271 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Student > Master 30 11%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Postgraduate 22 8%
Other 73 27%
Unknown 57 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 25%
Psychology 31 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 9%
Neuroscience 20 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 56 21%
Unknown 62 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,004,661
of 24,153,435 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#236
of 1,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,929
of 177,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,153,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.